The IRS closed more than 72,000 appeals last year and its Chief Counsel’s Office received more than 65,000 cases. That’s a lot of disputes. Safe to say they are about rules. Following rules. Not following rules. Questioning rules. Then, there are rules about rules that the IRS must follow.
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) is such a beast. The APA places requirements on federal agencies when engaged in a “rule making” that has the force and effect of law. The APA has become a focal point in tax litigation, due in large part to the IRS’s record of refusing to comply with the law’s notice-and-comment mandate. In his article for the Journal on Emerging Issues in Litigation, our guest – Jeffrey S. Luechtefeld, shareholder at Chamberlain Hrdlicka – wrote about challenging the IRS, recent trends in tax litigation, and the future of APA challenges. And now, he’s here on our humble podcast.
Jeff is a tax controversy and litigation attorney with a strong
technical tax background and a deep understanding of the inner workings
of the agency. Jeff advocates on behalf of clients in IRS examinations,
appeals and litigation. Previously, he led the regional tax controversy
practice for a Big Four accounting firm. He began his career with the
IRS Office of Chief Counsel as a litigator, eventually becoming a
Special Trial Attorney in the Large Business and International Division.
Jeff received his JD from the University of Missouri, Columbia School
of Law.
I hope you enjoy the episode. If so, give us a rating!
This podcast is the audio companion to the Journal on Emerging Issues in Litigation. The Journal is a collaborative project between HB Litigation Conferences, and the Fastcaselegal research family, which includes Full Court Press, Law Street Media,
and Docket Alarm — all now part of vLex. If you have comments or wish
to participate in one our projects please drop me a note at Editor@LitigationConferences.com. I’m often polite.
Tom Hagy
Litigation Enthusiast and
Host of the Emerging Litigation Podcast
Home PageLinkedIn
